Delivering Arbitrary-Modal Semantic Segmentation

Benchmark Model Rank Results
semantic-segmentation-on-bjroadCMNeXt#1IoU: 63.22
semantic-segmentation-on-ddd17CMNeXt#2mIoU: 72.67
semantic-segmentation-on-deliverCMNeXt (RGB-D-E-LiDAR)#5mIoU: 66.30
semantic-segmentation-on-deliver-1CMNeXt (RGB-D-E-LiDAR)#3mIoU: 66.30
semantic-segmentation-on-deliver-1CMNeXt (RGB-D-LiDAR)#4mIoU: 65.50
semantic-segmentation-on-deliver-1CMNeXt (RGB-D-Event)#5mIoU: 64.44
semantic-segmentation-on-deliver-1CMNeXt (RGB-Depth)#6mIoU: 63.58
semantic-segmentation-on-deliver-1CMNeXt (RGB-LiDAR)#7mIoU: 58.04
semantic-segmentation-on-deliver-1CMNeXt (RGB-Event)#8mIoU: 57.48
semantic-segmentation-on-dsecCMNeXt#2mIoU: 72.54
semantic-segmentation-on-kitti-360CMNeXt (RGB-D-E-LiDAR)#1mIoU: 67.84
semantic-segmentation-on-mcubesCMNeXt (B2 RGB-A-D-N)#10mIoU: 51.54%
semantic-segmentation-on-mcubesCMNeXt (B2 RGB-A-D)#17mIoU: 49.48%
semantic-segmentation-on-mcubesCMNeXt (B2 RGB-A)#18mIoU: 48.42%
semantic-segmentation-on-mcubes-pCMNeXt (B2 RGB-A-D)#7mIoU: 49.48
semantic-segmentation-on-mcubes-pCMNeXt (B2 RGB-A)#8mIoU: 48.42
semantic-segmentation-on-nyu-depth-v2CMNeXt (B4)#14Mean IoU: 56.9%
semantic-segmentation-on-portoCMNeXt#1IoU: 73.12
semantic-segmentation-on-tlcgisCMNeXt#3IoU: 82.26
semantic-segmentation-on-urbanlfCMNeXt (RGB-LF80)#1mIoU (Syn): 81.02mIoU (Real): 83.11
semantic-segmentation-on-urbanlfCMNeXt (RGB-LF33)#2mIoU (Syn): 80.98mIoU (Real): 82.62
semantic-segmentation-on-urbanlfCMNeXt (RGB-LF8)#3mIoU (Syn): 80.74mIoU (Real): 83.22
thermal-image-segmentation-on-mfn-datasetCMNeXt (B4)#5mIOU: 59.9
thermal-image-segmentation-on-noisy-rs-rgb-tCMNeXt (B4)#1mIoU: 60.3