An Empirical Study of Remote Sensing Pretraining

Benchmark Model Rank Results
building-change-detection-for-remote-sensingIMP-ViTAEv2-S-BIT#14F1: 91.26
building-change-detection-for-remote-sensingRSP-ViTAEv2-S-BIT#19F1: 90.93IoU: 84.95
building-change-detection-for-remote-sensingRSP-ResNet-50#23F1: 90.10
building-change-detection-for-remote-sensingRSP-Swin-T#24F1: 90.10
change-detection-for-remote-sensing-images-onIMP-ViTAEv2-S-BIT#8F1-Score: 0.9702
change-detection-for-remote-sensing-images-onRSP-ViTAEv2-S-BIT#9F1-Score: 0.9681
change-detection-for-remote-sensing-images-onRSP-ResNet-50-BIT#11F1-Score: 0.96
change-detection-for-remote-sensing-images-onRSP-Swin-T-BIT#13F1-Score: 0.9521
object-detection-in-aerial-images-on-dota-1RSP-ViTAEv2-S-FPN-ORCN#29mAP: 77.72%
object-detection-in-aerial-images-on-dota-1IMP-ViTAEv2-S-FPN-ORCN#32mAP: 77.38%
object-detection-in-aerial-images-on-dota-1RSP-ResNet-50-FPN-ORCN#38mAP: 76.50%
object-detection-in-aerial-images-on-dota-1RSP-Swin-T-FPN-ORCN#40mAP: 76.12%
object-detection-in-aerial-images-on-hrsc2016RSP-ViTAEv2-S-FPN-ORCN#5mAP-07: 90.4
object-detection-in-aerial-images-on-hrsc2016IMP-ViTAEv2-S-FPN-ORCN#6mAP-07: 90.4
object-detection-in-aerial-images-on-hrsc2016RSP-ResNet-50-FPN-ORCN#7mAP-07: 90.3
object-detection-in-aerial-images-on-hrsc2016RSP-Swin-T-FPN-ORCN#8mAP-07: 90.0
semantic-segmentation-on-isaidIMP-ViTAEv2-S-UperNet#11mIoU: 65.3
semantic-segmentation-on-isaidRSP-ViTAEv2-S-UperNet#14mIoU: 64.3
semantic-segmentation-on-isaidRSP-Swin-T-UperNet#15mIoU: 64.1
semantic-segmentation-on-isaidRSP-ResNet-50-UperNet#18mIoU: 61.6
semantic-segmentation-on-isprs-potsdamIMP-ViTAEv2-S-UperNet#5Overall Accuracy: 91.6
semantic-segmentation-on-isprs-potsdamRSP-ViTAEv2-S-UperNet#10Overall Accuracy: 91.21
semantic-segmentation-on-isprs-potsdamRSP-Swin-T-UperNet#12Overall Accuracy: 90.78
semantic-segmentation-on-isprs-potsdamRSP-ResNet-50-UperNet#14Overall Accuracy: 90.61