An Efficient Token Compression Framework for Visual Object Tracking

Benchmark Model Rank Results
visual-object-tracking-on-got-10kETCTrack-B224–Average Overlap: 79.2Success Rate 0.5: 90.2Success Rate 0.75: 78.6
visual-object-tracking-on-got-10kETCTrack-B384–Average Overlap: 80.1Success Rate 0.5: 89.5Success Rate 0.75: 80.7
visual-object-tracking-on-got-10kETCTrack-S224–Average Overlap: 75.8Success Rate 0.5: 86.6Success Rate 0.75: 75.0
visual-object-tracking-on-got-10kETCTrack-T224–Average Overlap: 74.9Success Rate 0.5: 85.6Success Rate 0.75: 72.6
visual-object-tracking-on-lasotETCTrack-B224–AUC: 74.9Normalized Precision: 85.1Precision: 82.7
visual-object-tracking-on-lasotETCTrack-B384–AUC: 75.9Normalized Precision: 85.9Precision: 84.0
visual-object-tracking-on-lasotETCTrack-S224–AUC: 73.4Normalized Precision: 83.5Precision: 81.1
visual-object-tracking-on-lasotETCTrack-T224–AUC: 71.8Normalized Precision: 82.1Precision: 78.9
visual-object-tracking-on-otb-2015ETCTrack-B224–AUC: 0.733
visual-object-tracking-on-otb-2015ETCTrack-B384–AUC: 0.736
visual-object-tracking-on-tnl2kETCTrack-B384–AUC: 63.0precision: 68.4