[]() | | 0.8475 ± 0.0003 | No | 0.8275 ± 0.0008 | 5908027 | HyperFusion | |
[]() | | 0.8420 ± 0.0015 | No | 0.8238 ± 0.0028 | 26706953 | PAS+FPs | |
[]() | | 0.8403 ± 0.0021 | No | 0.8176 ± 0.0034 | 1019408 | HIG | |
Large-scale Robust Deep AUC Maximization: A New Surrogate Loss and Empirical Studies on Medical Image Classification | ✓ Link | 0.8352 ± 0.0054 | No | 0.8238 ± 0.0061 | 3444509 | DeepAUC | 2020-12-06 |
[]() | | 0.8244 ± 0.0033 | No | 0.8329 ± 0.0039 | 1444110 | FingerPrint+GMAN | |
Molecular Representation Learning by Leveraging Chemical Information | ✓ Link | 0.8232 ± 0.0047 | No | 0.8331 ± 0.0054 | 2425102 | Neural FingerPrints | 2021-03-15 |
Do Transformers Really Perform Bad for Graph Representation? | ✓ Link | 0.8225 ± 0.0001 | No | 0.8396 ± 0.0001 | 47085378 | Graphormer + FPs | 2021-06-09 |
[]() | | 0.8208 ± 0.0037 | No | 0.8036 ± 0.0059 | 5782 | Molecular FP + Random Forest | |
Graph Propagation Transformer for Graph Representation Learning | ✓ Link | 0.8126 ± 0.0032 | Yes | | | GPTrans-B | 2023-05-19 |
Weisfeiler and Lehman Go Cellular: CW Networks | ✓ Link | 0.8094 ± 0.0057 | No | 0.8277 ± 0.0099 | 239745 | CIN | 2021-06-23 |
Interpretable and Generalizable Graph Learning via Stochastic Attention Mechanism | ✓ Link | 0.8067 ± 0.0950 | No | 0.8347 ± 0.0031 | 249602 | GSAT | 2022-01-31 |
[]() | | 0.8060 ± 0.0010 | No | 0.8420 ± 0.0030 | 230000 | MorganFP+Rand. Forest | |
Global Self-Attention as a Replacement for Graph Convolution | ✓ Link | 0.806 ± 0.0065 | | | | EGT | 2021-08-07 |
Weisfeiler and Lehman Go Cellular: CW Networks | ✓ Link | 0.8055 ± 0.0104 | No | 0.8310 ± 0.0102 | 138337 | CIN-small | 2021-06-23 |
Do Transformers Really Perform Bad for Graph Representation? | ✓ Link | 0.8051 ± 0.0053 | Yes | 0.8310 ± 0.0089 | 47183040 | Graphormer | 2021-06-09 |
Do Transformers Really Perform Bad for Graph Representation? | ✓ Link | 0.8051 ± 0.0053 | Yes | 0.8310 ± 0.0089 | 47183040 | Graphormer (pre-trained on PCQM4M) | 2021-06-09 |
Unlocking the Potential of Classic GNNs for Graph-level Tasks: Simple Architectures Meet Excellence | ✓ Link | 0.8040 ± 0.0164 | No | 0.8329 ± 0.0158 | 1076633 | GatedGCN+ | 2025-02-13 |
Improving Graph Neural Network Expressivity via Subgraph Isomorphism Counting | ✓ Link | 0.8039 ± 0.0090 | No | 0.8473 ± 0.0096 | 114211 | directional GSN | 2020-06-16 |
A Persistent Weisfeiler–Lehman Procedure for Graph Classification | ✓ Link | 0.8039 ± 0.0040 | No | 0.8279 ± 0.0059 | 4600000 | P-WL | 2019-06-09 |
Nested Graph Neural Networks | ✓ Link | 0.7986 ± 0.0105 | | 0.8080 ± 0.0278 | | Nested GIN+virtual node (ens) | 2021-10-25 |
Directional Graph Networks | ✓ Link | 0.7970 ± 0.0097 | No | 0.8470 ± 0.0047 | 114065 | DGN | 2020-10-06 |
Weisfeiler and Lehman Go Paths: Learning Topological Features via Path Complexes | | 0.7944 ± 1.40 | | | | PIN | 2023-08-13 |
Robust Optimization as Data Augmentation for Large-scale Graphs | ✓ Link | 0.7942 ± 0.0120 | No | 0.8425 ± 0.0061 | 531976 | DeeperGCN+FLAG | 2020-10-19 |
Parameterized Hypercomplex Graph Neural Networks for Graph Classification | ✓ Link | 0.7934 ± 0.0116 | No | 0.8217 ± 0.0089 | 110909 | PHC-GNN | 2021-03-30 |
Principal Neighbourhood Aggregation for Graph Nets | ✓ Link | 0.7905 ± 0.0132 | No | 0.8519 ± 0.0099 | 326081 | PNA | 2020-04-12 |
GraphNorm: A Principled Approach to Accelerating Graph Neural Network Training | ✓ Link | 0.7883 ± 0.0100 | No | 0.7904 ± 0.0115 | 526201 | GCN+GraphNorm | 2020-09-07 |
Recipe for a General, Powerful, Scalable Graph Transformer | ✓ Link | 0.7880 | No | 0.8255 ± 0.0092 | 558625 | GPS | 2022-05-25 |
Hierarchical Inter-Message Passing for Learning on Molecular Graphs | ✓ Link | 0.7880 ± 0.0082 | No | Please tell us | 153029 | HIMP | 2020-06-22 |
DeeperGCN: All You Need to Train Deeper GCNs | ✓ Link | 0.7858 ± 0.0117 | No | 0.8427 ± 0.0063 | 531976 | DeeperGCN | 2020-06-13 |
Nested Graph Neural Networks | ✓ Link | 0.7834 ± 0.0186 | | 0.8317 ± 0.0199 | | Nested GIN+virtual node | 2021-10-25 |
[]() | | 0.7825 ± 0.0121 | No | 0.8009 ± 0.0078 | 32385 | GIN | |
Do We Need Anisotropic Graph Neural Networks? | ✓ Link | 0.7818 ± 0.0153 | No | 0.8396 ± 0.0097 | 317265 | EGC-M (No Edge Features) | 2021-04-03 |
Improving Graph Neural Network Expressivity via Subgraph Isomorphism Counting | ✓ Link | 0.7799 ± 0.0100 | No | 0.8658 ± 0.0084 | 3338701 | GSN | 2020-06-16 |
Wasserstein Embedding for Graph Learning | ✓ Link | 0.7757 ± 0.0111 | No | 0.8101 ± 0.0097 | 361064 | WEGL | 2020-06-16 |
Robust Optimization as Data Augmentation for Large-scale Graphs | ✓ Link | 0.7748 ± 0.0096 | No | 0.8438 ± 0.0128 | 3336306 | GIN+virtual node+FLAG | 2020-10-19 |
Do We Need Anisotropic Graph Neural Networks? | ✓ Link | 0.7721 ± 0.0110 | No | 0.8366 ± 0.0074 | 317013 | EGC-S (No Edge Features) | 2021-04-03 |
How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks? | ✓ Link | 0.7707 ± 0.0149 | No | 0.8479 ± 0.0068 | 3336306 | GIN+virtual node | 2018-10-01 |
Robust Optimization as Data Augmentation for Large-scale Graphs | ✓ Link | 0.7683 ± 0.0102 | No | 0.8176 ± 0.0087 | 527701 | GCN+FLAG | 2020-10-19 |
Robust Optimization as Data Augmentation for Large-scale Graphs | ✓ Link | 0.7654 ± 0.0114 | No | 0.8225 ± 0.0155 | 1885206 | GIN+FLAG | 2020-10-19 |
Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks | ✓ Link | 0.7606 ± 0.0097 | No | 0.8204 ± 0.0141 | 527701 | GCN | 2016-09-09 |
Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks | ✓ Link | 0.7599 ± 0.0119 | No | 0.8384 ± 0.0091 | 1978801 | GCN+virtual node | 2016-09-09 |
How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks? | ✓ Link | 0.7558 ± 0.0140 | No | 0.8232 ± 0.0090 | 1885206 | GIN | 2018-10-01 |
Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks | ✓ Link | 0.7549 ± 0.0163 | No | 0.8042 ± 0.0107 | 527701 | GCN (in Julia) | 2016-09-09 |